summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp')
-rw-r--r--indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp63
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp b/indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp
index bc93fa2c20..126c6be388 100644
--- a/indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp
+++ b/indra/newview/lllogininstance.cpp
@@ -253,14 +253,12 @@ bool LLLoginInstance::handleLoginEvent(const LLSD& event)
mLoginState = event["state"].asString();
mResponseData = event["data"];
-
+
if(event.has("transfer_rate"))
{
mTransferRate = event["transfer_rate"].asReal();
}
-
-
// Call the method registered in constructor, if any, for more specific
// handling
mDispatcher.try_call(event);
@@ -276,6 +274,14 @@ void LLLoginInstance::handleLoginFailure(const LLSD& event)
// Login has failed.
// Figure out why and respond...
LLSD response = event["data"];
+ LLSD updater = response["updater"];
+
+ // Always provide a response to the updater, if in fact the updater
+ // contacted us, if in fact the ping contains a 'reply' key. Most code
+ // paths tell it not to proceed with updating.
+ ResponsePtr resp(std::make_shared<LLEventAPI::Response>
+ (LLSDMap("update", false), updater));
+
std::string reason_response = response["reason"].asString();
std::string message_response = response["message"].asString();
LL_DEBUGS("LLLogin") << "reason " << reason_response
@@ -328,17 +334,44 @@ void LLLoginInstance::handleLoginFailure(const LLSD& event)
}
else if(reason_response == "update")
{
- // This shouldn't happen - the viewer manager should have forced an update;
- // possibly the user ran the viewer directly and bypassed the update check
+ // This can happen if the user clicked Login quickly, before we heard
+ // back from the Viewer Version Manager, but login failed because
+ // login.cgi is insisting on a required update. We were called with an
+ // event that bundles both the login.cgi 'response' and the
+ // synchronization event from the 'updater'.
std::string required_version = response["message_args"]["VERSION"];
LL_WARNS("LLLogin") << "Login failed because an update to version " << required_version << " is required." << LL_ENDL;
if (gViewerWindow)
gViewerWindow->setShowProgress(FALSE);
- LLSD data(LLSD::emptyMap());
- data["VERSION"] = required_version;
- LLNotificationsUtil::add("RequiredUpdate", data, LLSD::emptyMap(), boost::bind(&LLLoginInstance::handleLoginDisallowed, this, _1, _2));
+ LLSD args(LLSDMap("VERSION", required_version));
+ if (updater.isUndefined())
+ {
+ // If the updater failed to shake hands, better advise the user to
+ // download the update him/herself.
+ LLNotificationsUtil::add(
+ "RequiredUpdate",
+ args,
+ updater,
+ boost::bind(&LLLoginInstance::handleLoginDisallowed, this, _1, _2));
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ // If we've heard from the updater that an update is required,
+ // then display the prompt that assures the user we'll take care
+ // of it. This is the one case in which we bind 'resp':
+ // instead of destroying our Response object (and thus sending a
+ // negative reply to the updater) as soon as we exit this
+ // function, bind our shared_ptr so it gets passed into
+ // syncWithUpdater. That ensures that the response is delayed
+ // until the user has responded to the notification.
+ LLNotificationsUtil::add(
+ "PauseForUpdate",
+ args,
+ updater,
+ boost::bind(&LLLoginInstance::syncWithUpdater, this, resp, _1, _2));
+ }
}
else if( reason_response == "key"
|| reason_response == "presence"
@@ -361,6 +394,19 @@ void LLLoginInstance::handleLoginFailure(const LLSD& event)
}
}
+void LLLoginInstance::syncWithUpdater(ResponsePtr resp, const LLSD& notification, const LLSD& response)
+{
+ LL_INFOS("LLLogin") << "LLLoginInstance::syncWithUpdater" << LL_ENDL;
+ // 'resp' points to an instance of LLEventAPI::Response that will be
+ // destroyed as soon as we return and the notification response functor is
+ // unregistered. Modify it so that it tells the updater to go ahead and
+ // perform the update. Naturally, if we allowed the user a choice as to
+ // whether to proceed or not, this assignment would reflect the user's
+ // selection.
+ (*resp)["update"] = true;
+ attemptComplete();
+}
+
void LLLoginInstance::handleLoginDisallowed(const LLSD& notification, const LLSD& response)
{
attemptComplete();
@@ -420,7 +466,6 @@ bool LLLoginInstance::handleTOSResponse(bool accepted, const std::string& key)
return true;
}
-
std::string construct_start_string()
{
std::string start;