summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp')
-rwxr-xr-xindra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp691
1 files changed, 691 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp b/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..29060d4ef5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,691 @@
+/**
+ * @file llleap_test.cpp
+ * @author Nat Goodspeed
+ * @date 2012-02-21
+ * @brief Test for llleap.
+ *
+ * $LicenseInfo:firstyear=2012&license=viewerlgpl$
+ * Copyright (c) 2012, Linden Research, Inc.
+ * $/LicenseInfo$
+ */
+
+// Precompiled header
+#include "linden_common.h"
+// associated header
+#include "llleap.h"
+// STL headers
+// std headers
+// external library headers
+#include <boost/assign/list_of.hpp>
+#include <boost/lambda/lambda.hpp>
+#include <boost/foreach.hpp>
+// other Linden headers
+#include "../test/lltut.h"
+#include "../test/namedtempfile.h"
+#include "../test/manageapr.h"
+#include "../test/catch_and_store_what_in.h"
+#include "wrapllerrs.h"
+#include "llevents.h"
+#include "llprocess.h"
+#include "stringize.h"
+#include "StringVec.h"
+#include <functional>
+
+using boost::assign::list_of;
+
+static ManageAPR manager;
+
+StringVec sv(const StringVec& listof) { return listof; }
+
+#if defined(LL_WINDOWS)
+#define sleep(secs) _sleep((secs) * 1000)
+#endif
+
+#if ! LL_WINDOWS
+const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 1023*1024; // try wrangling just under a megabyte of data
+#else
+// "Then there's Windows... sigh." The "very large message" test is flaky in a
+// way that seems to point to either the OS (nonblocking writes to pipes) or
+// possibly the apr_file_write() function. Poring over log messages reveals
+// that at some point along the way apr_file_write() returns 11 (Resource
+// temporarily unavailable, i.e. EAGAIN) and says it wrote 0 bytes -- even
+// though it did write the chunk! Our next write attempt retries the same
+// chunk, resulting in the chunk being duplicated at the child end, corrupting
+// the data stream. Much as I would love to be able to fix it for real, such a
+// fix would appear to require distinguishing bogus EAGAIN returns from real
+// ones -- how?? Empirically this behavior is only observed when writing a
+// "very large message". To be able to move forward at all, try to bypass this
+// particular failure by adjusting the size of a "very large message" on
+// Windows.
+const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 65336;
+#endif // LL_WINDOWS
+
+void waitfor(const std::vector<LLLeap*>& instances, int timeout=60)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < timeout; ++i)
+ {
+ // Every iteration, test whether any of the passed LLLeap instances
+ // still exist (are still running).
+ std::vector<LLLeap*>::const_iterator vli(instances.begin()), vlend(instances.end());
+ for ( ; vli != vlend; ++vli)
+ {
+ // getInstance() returns NULL if it's terminated/gone, non-NULL if
+ // it's still running
+ if (LLLeap::getInstance(*vli))
+ break;
+ }
+ // If we made it through all of 'instances' without finding one that's
+ // still running, we're done.
+ if (vli == vlend)
+ {
+/*==========================================================================*|
+ std::cout << instances.size() << " LLLeap instances terminated in "
+ << i << " seconds, proceeding" << std::endl;
+|*==========================================================================*/
+ return;
+ }
+ // Found an instance that's still running. Wait and pump LLProcess.
+ sleep(1);
+ LLEventPumps::instance().obtain("mainloop").post(LLSD());
+ }
+ tut::ensure(STRINGIZE("at least 1 of " << instances.size()
+ << " LLLeap instances timed out ("
+ << timeout << " seconds) without terminating"),
+ i < timeout);
+}
+
+void waitfor(LLLeap* instance, int timeout=60)
+{
+ std::vector<LLLeap*> instances;
+ instances.push_back(instance);
+ waitfor(instances, timeout);
+}
+
+/*****************************************************************************
+* TUT
+*****************************************************************************/
+namespace tut
+{
+ struct llleap_data
+ {
+ llleap_data():
+ reader(".py",
+ // This logic is adapted from vita.viewerclient.receiveEvent()
+ boost::lambda::_1 <<
+ "import re\n"
+ "import os\n"
+ "import sys\n"
+ "\n"
+ // Don't forget that this Python script is written to some
+ // temp directory somewhere! Its __file__ is useless in
+ // finding indra/lib/python. Use our __FILE__, with
+ // raw-string syntax to deal with Windows pathnames.
+ "mydir = os.path.dirname(r'" << __FILE__ << "')\n"
+ // We expect mydir to be .../indra/llcommon/tests.
+ "sys.path.insert(0,\n"
+ " os.path.join(mydir, os.pardir, os.pardir, 'lib', 'python'))\n"
+ "from indra.base import llsd\n"
+ "\n"
+ "class ProtocolError(Exception):\n"
+ " def __init__(self, msg, data):\n"
+ " Exception.__init__(self, msg)\n"
+ " self.data = data\n"
+ "\n"
+ "class ParseError(ProtocolError):\n"
+ " pass\n"
+ "\n"
+ "def get():\n"
+ " hdr = ''\n"
+ " while ':' not in hdr and len(hdr) < 20:\n"
+ " hdr += sys.stdin.read(1)\n"
+ " if not hdr:\n"
+ " sys.exit(0)\n"
+ " if not hdr.endswith(':'):\n"
+ " raise ProtocolError('Expected len:data, got %r' % hdr, hdr)\n"
+ " try:\n"
+ " length = int(hdr[:-1])\n"
+ " except ValueError:\n"
+ " raise ProtocolError('Non-numeric len %r' % hdr[:-1], hdr[:-1])\n"
+ " parts = []\n"
+ " received = 0\n"
+ " while received < length:\n"
+ " parts.append(sys.stdin.read(length - received))\n"
+ " received += len(parts[-1])\n"
+ " data = ''.join(parts)\n"
+ " assert len(data) == length\n"
+ " try:\n"
+ " return llsd.parse(data)\n"
+ // Seems the old indra.base.llsd module didn't properly
+ // convert IndexError (from running off end of string) to
+ // LLSDParseError.
+ " except (IndexError, llsd.LLSDParseError), e:\n"
+ " msg = 'Bad received packet (%s)' % e\n"
+ " print >>sys.stderr, '%s, %s bytes:' % (msg, len(data))\n"
+ " showmax = 40\n"
+ // We've observed failures with very large packets;
+ // dumping the entire packet wastes time and space.
+ // But if the error states a particular byte offset,
+ // truncate to (near) that offset when dumping data.
+ " location = re.search(r' at (byte|index) ([0-9]+)', str(e))\n"
+ " if not location:\n"
+ " # didn't find offset, dump whole thing, no ellipsis\n"
+ " ellipsis = ''\n"
+ " else:\n"
+ " # found offset within error message\n"
+ " trunc = int(location.group(2)) + showmax\n"
+ " data = data[:trunc]\n"
+ " ellipsis = '... (%s more)' % (length - trunc)\n"
+ " offset = -showmax\n"
+ " for offset in xrange(0, len(data)-showmax, showmax):\n"
+ " print >>sys.stderr, '%04d: %r +' % \\\n"
+ " (offset, data[offset:offset+showmax])\n"
+ " offset += showmax\n"
+ " print >>sys.stderr, '%04d: %r%s' % \\\n"
+ " (offset, data[offset:], ellipsis)\n"
+ " raise ParseError(msg, data)\n"
+ "\n"
+ "# deal with initial stdin message\n"
+ // this will throw if the initial write to stdin doesn't
+ // follow len:data protocol, or if we couldn't find 'pump'
+ // in the dict
+ "_reply = get()['pump']\n"
+ "\n"
+ "def replypump():\n"
+ " return _reply\n"
+ "\n"
+ "def put(req):\n"
+ " sys.stdout.write(':'.join((str(len(req)), req)))\n"
+ " sys.stdout.flush()\n"
+ "\n"
+ "def send(pump, data):\n"
+ " put(llsd.format_notation(dict(pump=pump, data=data)))\n"
+ "\n"
+ "def request(pump, data):\n"
+ " # we expect 'data' is a dict\n"
+ " data['reply'] = _reply\n"
+ " send(pump, data)\n"),
+ // Get the actual pathname of the NamedExtTempFile and trim off
+ // the ".py" extension. (We could cache reader.getName() in a
+ // separate member variable, but I happen to know getName() just
+ // returns a NamedExtTempFile member rather than performing any
+ // computation, so I don't mind calling it twice.) Then take the
+ // basename.
+ reader_module(LLProcess::basename(
+ reader.getName().substr(0, reader.getName().length()-3))),
+ pPYTHON(getenv("PYTHON")),
+ PYTHON(pPYTHON? pPYTHON : "")
+ {
+ ensure("Set PYTHON to interpreter pathname", pPYTHON);
+ }
+ NamedExtTempFile reader;
+ const std::string reader_module;
+ const char* pPYTHON;
+ const std::string PYTHON;
+ };
+ typedef test_group<llleap_data> llleap_group;
+ typedef llleap_group::object object;
+ llleap_group llleapgrp("llleap");
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<1>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("multiple LLLeap instances");
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ "import time\n"
+ "time.sleep(1)\n");
+ std::vector<LLLeap*> instances;
+ instances.push_back(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ instances.push_back(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ // In this case we're simply establishing that two LLLeap instances
+ // can coexist without throwing exceptions or bombing in any other
+ // way. Wait for them to terminate.
+ waitfor(instances);
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<2>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("stderr to log");
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ "import sys\n"
+ "sys.stderr.write('''Hello from Python!\n"
+ "note partial line''')\n");
+ CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_INFO);
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ log.messageWith("Hello from Python!");
+ log.messageWith("note partial line");
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<3>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("bad stdout protocol");
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ "print 'Hello from Python!'\n");
+ CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN);
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ ensure_contains("error log line",
+ log.messageWith("invalid protocol"), "Hello from Python!");
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<4>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("leftover stdout");
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ "import sys\n"
+ // note lack of newline
+ "sys.stdout.write('Hello from Python!')\n");
+ CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN);
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ ensure_contains("error log line",
+ log.messageWith("Discarding"), "Hello from Python!");
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<5>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("bad stdout len prefix");
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ "import sys\n"
+ "sys.stdout.write('5a2:something')\n");
+ CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN);
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(),
+ sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ ensure_contains("error log line",
+ log.messageWith("invalid protocol"), "5a2:");
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<6>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("empty plugin vector");
+ std::string threw;
+ try
+ {
+ LLLeap::create("empty", StringVec());
+ }
+ CATCH_AND_STORE_WHAT_IN(threw, LLLeap::Error)
+ ensure_contains("LLLeap::Error", threw, "no plugin");
+ // try the suppress-exception variant
+ ensure("bad launch returned non-NULL", ! LLLeap::create("empty", StringVec(), false));
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<7>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("bad launch");
+ // Synthesize bogus executable name
+ std::string BADPYTHON(PYTHON.substr(0, PYTHON.length()-1) + "x");
+ CaptureLog log;
+ std::string threw;
+ try
+ {
+ LLLeap::create("bad exe", BADPYTHON);
+ }
+ CATCH_AND_STORE_WHAT_IN(threw, LLLeap::Error)
+ ensure_contains("LLLeap::create() didn't throw", threw, "failed");
+ log.messageWith("failed");
+ log.messageWith(BADPYTHON);
+ // try the suppress-exception variant
+ ensure("bad launch returned non-NULL", ! LLLeap::create("bad exe", BADPYTHON, false));
+ }
+
+ // Generic self-contained listener: derive from this and override its
+ // call() method, then tell somebody to post on the pump named getName().
+ // Control will reach your call() override.
+ struct ListenerBase
+ {
+ // Pass the pump name you want; will tweak for uniqueness.
+ ListenerBase(const std::string& name):
+ mPump(name, true)
+ {
+ mPump.listen(name, boost::bind(&ListenerBase::call, this, _1));
+ }
+
+ virtual ~ListenerBase() {} // pacify MSVC
+
+ virtual bool call(const LLSD& request)
+ {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ LLEventPump& getPump() { return mPump; }
+ const LLEventPump& getPump() const { return mPump; }
+
+ std::string getName() const { return mPump.getName(); }
+ void post(const LLSD& data) { mPump.post(data); }
+
+ LLEventStream mPump;
+ };
+
+ // Mimic a dummy little LLEventAPI that merely sends a reply back to its
+ // requester on the "reply" pump.
+ struct AckAPI: public ListenerBase
+ {
+ AckAPI(): ListenerBase("AckAPI") {}
+
+ virtual bool call(const LLSD& request)
+ {
+ LLEventPumps::instance().obtain(request["reply"]).post("ack");
+ return false;
+ }
+ };
+
+ // Give LLLeap script a way to post success/failure.
+ struct Result: public ListenerBase
+ {
+ Result(): ListenerBase("Result") {}
+
+ virtual bool call(const LLSD& request)
+ {
+ mData = request;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ void ensure() const
+ {
+ tut::ensure(std::string("never posted to ") + getName(), mData.isDefined());
+ // Post an empty string for success, non-empty string is failure message.
+ tut::ensure(mData, mData.asString().empty());
+ }
+
+ LLSD mData;
+ };
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<8>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("round trip");
+ AckAPI api;
+ Result result;
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ boost::lambda::_1 <<
+ "from " << reader_module << " import *\n"
+ // make a request on our little API
+ "request(pump='" << api.getName() << "', data={})\n"
+ // wait for its response
+ "resp = get()\n"
+ "result = '' if resp == dict(pump=replypump(), data='ack')\\\n"
+ " else 'bad: ' + str(resp)\n"
+ "send(pump='" << result.getName() << "', data=result)\n");
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))));
+ result.ensure();
+ }
+
+ struct ReqIDAPI: public ListenerBase
+ {
+ ReqIDAPI(): ListenerBase("ReqIDAPI") {}
+
+ virtual bool call(const LLSD& request)
+ {
+ // free function from llevents.h
+ sendReply(LLSD(), request);
+ return false;
+ }
+ };
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<9>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("many small messages");
+ // It's not clear to me whether there's value in iterating many times
+ // over a send/receive loop -- I don't think that will exercise any
+ // interesting corner cases. This test first sends a large number of
+ // messages, then receives all the responses. The intent is to ensure
+ // that some of that data stream crosses buffer boundaries, loop
+ // iterations etc. in OS pipes and the LLLeap/LLProcess implementation.
+ ReqIDAPI api;
+ Result result;
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ boost::lambda::_1 <<
+ "import sys\n"
+ "from " << reader_module << " import *\n"
+ // Note that since reader imports llsd, this
+ // 'import *' gets us llsd too.
+ "sample = llsd.format_notation(dict(pump='" <<
+ api.getName() << "', data=dict(reqid=999999, reply=replypump())))\n"
+ // The whole packet has length prefix too: "len:data"
+ "samplen = len(str(len(sample))) + 1 + len(sample)\n"
+ // guess how many messages it will take to
+ // accumulate BUFFERED_LENGTH
+ "count = int(" << BUFFERED_LENGTH << "/samplen)\n"
+ "print >>sys.stderr, 'Sending %s requests' % count\n"
+ "for i in xrange(count):\n"
+ " request('" << api.getName() << "', dict(reqid=i))\n"
+ // The assumption in this specific test that
+ // replies will arrive in the same order as
+ // requests is ONLY valid because the API we're
+ // invoking sends replies instantly. If the API
+ // had to wait for some external event before
+ // sending its reply, replies could arrive in
+ // arbitrary order, and we'd have to tick them
+ // off from a set.
+ "result = ''\n"
+ "for i in xrange(count):\n"
+ " resp = get()\n"
+ " if resp['data']['reqid'] != i:\n"
+ " result = 'expected reqid=%s in %s' % (i, resp)\n"
+ " break\n"
+ "send(pump='" << result.getName() << "', data=result)\n");
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), sv(list_of(PYTHON)(script.getName()))),
+ 300); // needs more realtime than most tests
+ result.ensure();
+ }
+
+ // This is the body of test<10>, extracted so we can run it over a number
+ // of large-message sizes.
+ void test_large_message(const std::string& PYTHON, const std::string& reader_module,
+ const std::string& test_name, size_t size)
+ {
+ ReqIDAPI api;
+ Result result;
+ NamedTempFile script("py",
+ boost::lambda::_1 <<
+ "import sys\n"
+ "from " << reader_module << " import *\n"
+ // Generate a very large string value.
+ "desired = int(sys.argv[1])\n"
+ // 7 chars per item: 6 digits, 1 comma
+ "count = int((desired - 50)/7)\n"
+ "large = ''.join('%06d,' % i for i in xrange(count))\n"
+ // Pass 'large' as reqid because we know the API
+ // will echo reqid, and we want to receive it back.
+ "request('" << api.getName() << "', dict(reqid=large))\n"
+ "try:\n"
+ " resp = get()\n"
+ "except ParseError, e:\n"
+ " # try to find where e.data diverges from expectation\n"
+ // Normally we'd expect a 'pump' key in there,
+ // too, with value replypump(). But Python
+ // serializes keys in a different order than C++,
+ // so incoming data start with 'data'.
+ // Truthfully, though, if we get as far as 'pump'
+ // before we find a difference, something's very
+ // strange.
+ " expect = llsd.format_notation(dict(data=dict(reqid=large)))\n"
+ " chunk = 40\n"
+ " for offset in xrange(0, max(len(e.data), len(expect)), chunk):\n"
+ " if e.data[offset:offset+chunk] != \\\n"
+ " expect[offset:offset+chunk]:\n"
+ " print >>sys.stderr, 'Offset %06d: expect %r,\\n'\\\n"
+ " ' get %r' %\\\n"
+ " (offset,\n"
+ " expect[offset:offset+chunk],\n"
+ " e.data[offset:offset+chunk])\n"
+ " break\n"
+ " else:\n"
+ " print >>sys.stderr, 'incoming data matches expect?!'\n"
+ " send('" << result.getName() << "', '%s: %s' % (e.__class__.__name__, e))\n"
+ " sys.exit(1)\n"
+ "\n"
+ "echoed = resp['data']['reqid']\n"
+ "if echoed == large:\n"
+ " send('" << result.getName() << "', '')\n"
+ " sys.exit(0)\n"
+ // Here we know echoed did NOT match; try to find where
+ "for i in xrange(count):\n"
+ " start = 7*i\n"
+ " end = 7*(i+1)\n"
+ " if end > len(echoed)\\\n"
+ " or echoed[start:end] != large[start:end]:\n"
+ " send('" << result.getName() << "',\n"
+ " 'at offset %s, expected %r but got %r' %\n"
+ " (start, large[start:end], echoed[start:end]))\n"
+ "sys.exit(1)\n");
+ waitfor(LLLeap::create(test_name,
+ sv(list_of
+ (PYTHON)
+ (script.getName())
+ (stringize(size)))),
+ 180); // try a longer timeout
+ result.ensure();
+ }
+
+ struct TestLargeMessage: public std::binary_function<size_t, size_t, bool>
+ {
+ TestLargeMessage(const std::string& PYTHON_, const std::string& reader_module_,
+ const std::string& test_name_):
+ PYTHON(PYTHON_),
+ reader_module(reader_module_),
+ test_name(test_name_)
+ {}
+
+ bool operator()(size_t left, size_t right) const
+ {
+ // We don't know whether upper_bound is going to pass the "sought
+ // value" as the left or the right operand. We pass 0 as the
+ // "sought value" so we can distinguish it. Of course that means
+ // the sequence we're searching must not itself contain 0!
+ size_t size;
+ bool success;
+ if (left)
+ {
+ size = left;
+ // Consider our return value carefully. Normal binary_search
+ // (or, in our case, upper_bound) expects a container sorted
+ // in ascending order, and defaults to the std::less
+ // comparator. Our container is in fact in ascending order, so
+ // return consistently with std::less. Here we were called as
+ // compare(item, sought). If std::less were called that way,
+ // 'true' would mean to move right (to higher numbers) within
+ // the sequence: the item being considered is less than the
+ // sought value. For us, that means that test_large_message()
+ // success should return 'true'.
+ success = true;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ size = right;
+ // Here we were called as compare(sought, item). If std::less
+ // were called that way, 'true' would mean to move left (to
+ // lower numbers) within the sequence: the sought value is
+ // less than the item being considered. For us, that means
+ // test_large_message() FAILURE should return 'true', hence
+ // test_large_message() success should return 'false'.
+ success = false;
+ }
+
+ try
+ {
+ test_large_message(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, size);
+ std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") succeeded" << std::endl;
+ return success;
+ }
+ catch (const failure& e)
+ {
+ std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") failed: " << e.what() << std::endl;
+ return ! success;
+ }
+ }
+
+ const std::string PYTHON, reader_module, test_name;
+ };
+
+ // The point of this function is to try to find a size at which
+ // test_large_message() can succeed. We still want the overall test to
+ // fail; otherwise we won't get the coder's attention -- but if
+ // test_large_message() fails, try to find a plausible size at which it
+ // DOES work.
+ void test_or_split(const std::string& PYTHON, const std::string& reader_module,
+ const std::string& test_name, size_t size)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ test_large_message(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, size);
+ }
+ catch (const failure& e)
+ {
+ std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") failed: " << e.what() << std::endl;
+ // If it still fails below 4K, give up: subdividing any further is
+ // pointless.
+ if (size >= 4096)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ // Recur with half the size
+ size_t smaller(size/2);
+ test_or_split(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, smaller);
+ // Recursive call will throw if test_large_message()
+ // failed, therefore we only reach the line below if it
+ // succeeded.
+ std::cout << "but test_large_message(" << smaller << ") succeeded" << std::endl;
+
+ // Binary search for largest size that works. But since
+ // std::binary_search() only returns bool, actually use
+ // std::upper_bound(), consistent with our desire to find
+ // the LARGEST size that works. First generate a sorted
+ // container of all the sizes we intend to try, from
+ // 'smaller' (known to work) to 'size' (known to fail). We
+ // could whomp up magic iterators to do this dynamically,
+ // without actually instantiating a vector, but for a test
+ // program this will do. At least preallocate the vector.
+ // Per TestLargeMessage comments, it's important that this
+ // vector not contain 0.
+ std::vector<size_t> sizes;
+ sizes.reserve((size - smaller)/4096 + 1);
+ for (size_t sz(smaller), szend(size); sz < szend; sz += 4096)
+ sizes.push_back(sz);
+ // our comparator
+ TestLargeMessage tester(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name);
+ // Per TestLargeMessage comments, pass 0 as the sought value.
+ std::vector<size_t>::const_iterator found =
+ std::upper_bound(sizes.begin(), sizes.end(), 0, tester);
+ if (found != sizes.end() && found != sizes.begin())
+ {
+ std::cout << "test_large_message(" << *(found - 1)
+ << ") is largest that succeeds" << std::endl;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ std::cout << "cannot determine largest test_large_message(size) "
+ << "that succeeds" << std::endl;
+ }
+ }
+ catch (const failure&)
+ {
+ // The recursive test_or_split() call above has already
+ // handled the exception. We don't want our caller to see
+ // innermost exception; propagate outermost (below).
+ }
+ }
+ // In any case, because we reached here through failure of
+ // our original test_large_message(size) call, ensure failure
+ // propagates.
+ throw e;
+ }
+ }
+
+ template<> template<>
+ void object::test<10>()
+ {
+ set_test_name("very large message");
+ test_or_split(PYTHON, reader_module, get_test_name(), BUFFERED_LENGTH);
+ }
+} // namespace tut
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-02 20:23:25 +0000