1 files changed, 154 insertions, 37 deletions

diff --git a/indra/llcommon/llcoros.h b/indra/llcommon/llcoros.h
index 01ee11da1a..39316ed0e6 100755
--- a/indra/llcommon/llcoros.h
+++ b/indra/llcommon/llcoros.h
@@ -30,14 +30,20 @@
 #define LL_LLCOROS_H
 
 #include <boost/dcoroutine/coroutine.hpp>
+#include <boost/dcoroutine/future.hpp>
 #include "llsingleton.h"
 #include <boost/ptr_container/ptr_map.hpp>
+#include <boost/function.hpp>
+#include <boost/thread/tss.hpp>
 #include <string>
-#include <boost/preprocessor/repetition/enum_params.hpp>
-#include <boost/preprocessor/repetition/enum_binary_params.hpp>
-#include <boost/preprocessor/iteration/local.hpp>
 #include <stdexcept>
 
+// forward-declare helper class
+namespace llcoro
+{
+class Suspending;
+}
+
 /**
  * Registry of named Boost.Coroutine instances
  *
@@ -80,8 +86,8 @@ class LL_COMMON_API LLCoros: public LLSingleton<LLCoros>
 public:
     /// Canonical boost::dcoroutines::coroutine signature we use
     typedef boost::dcoroutines::coroutine<void()> coro;
-    /// Canonical 'self' type
-    typedef coro::self self;
+    /// Canonical callable type
+    typedef boost::function<void()> callable_t;
 
     /**
      * Create and start running a new coroutine with specified name. The name
@@ -94,39 +100,33 @@ public:
      * {
      * public:
      *     ...
-     *     // Do NOT NOT NOT accept reference params other than 'self'!
+     *     // Do NOT NOT NOT accept reference params!
      *     // Pass by value only!
-     *     void myCoroutineMethod(LLCoros::self& self, std::string, LLSD);
+     *     void myCoroutineMethod(std::string, LLSD);
      *     ...
      * };
      * ...
      * std::string name = LLCoros::instance().launch(
-     *    "mycoro", boost::bind(&MyClass::myCoroutineMethod, this, _1,
+     *    "mycoro", boost::bind(&MyClass::myCoroutineMethod, this,
      *                          "somestring", LLSD(17));
      * @endcode
      *
-     * Your function/method must accept LLCoros::self& as its first parameter.
-     * It can accept any other parameters you want -- but ONLY BY VALUE!
-     * Other reference parameters are a BAD IDEA! You Have Been Warned. See
+     * Your function/method can accept any parameters you want -- but ONLY BY
+     * VALUE! Reference parameters are a BAD IDEA! You Have Been Warned. See
      * DEV-32777 comments for an explanation.
      *
-     * Pass a callable that accepts the single LLCoros::self& parameter. It
-     * may work to pass a free function whose only parameter is 'self'; for
-     * all other cases use boost::bind(). Of course, for a non-static class
-     * method, the first parameter must be the class instance. Use the
-     * placeholder _1 for the 'self' parameter. Any other parameters should be
-     * passed via the bind() expression.
+     * Pass a nullary callable. It works to directly pass a nullary free
+     * function (or static method); for all other cases use boost::bind(). Of
+     * course, for a non-static class method, the first parameter must be the
+     * class instance. Any other parameters should be passed via the bind()
+     * expression.
      *
      * launch() tweaks the suggested name so it won't collide with any
      * existing coroutine instance, creates the coroutine instance, registers
      * it with the tweaked name and runs it until its first wait. At that
      * point it returns the tweaked name.
      */
-    template <typename CALLABLE>
-    std::string launch(const std::string& prefix, const CALLABLE& callable)
-    {
-        return launchImpl(prefix, new coro(callable, mStackSize));
-    }
+    std::string launch(const std::string& prefix, const callable_t& callable);
 
     /**
      * Abort a running coroutine by name. Normally, when a coroutine either
@@ -138,33 +138,150 @@ public:
     bool kill(const std::string& name);
 
     /**
-     * From within a coroutine, pass its @c self object to look up the
-     * (tweaked) name string by which this coroutine is registered. Returns
-     * the empty string if not found (e.g. if the coroutine was launched by
-     * hand rather than using LLCoros::launch()).
+     * From within a coroutine, look up the (tweaked) name string by which
+     * this coroutine is registered. Returns the empty string if not found
+     * (e.g. if the coroutine was launched by hand rather than using
+     * LLCoros::launch()).
      */
-    template <typename COROUTINE_SELF>
-    std::string getName(const COROUTINE_SELF& self) const
-    {
-        return getNameByID(self.get_id());
-    }
-
-    /// getName() by self.get_id()
-    std::string getNameByID(const void* self_id) const;
+    std::string getName() const;
 
     /// for delayed initialization
     void setStackSize(S32 stacksize);
 
+    /// get the current coro::self& for those who really really care
+    static coro::self& get_self();
+
+    /**
+     * Most coroutines, most of the time, don't "consume" the events for which
+     * they're suspending. This way, an arbitrary number of listeners (whether
+     * coroutines or simple callbacks) can be registered on a particular
+     * LLEventPump, every listener responding to each of the events on that
+     * LLEventPump. But a particular coroutine can assert that it will consume
+     * each event for which it suspends. (See also llcoro::postAndSuspend(),
+     * llcoro::VoidListener)
+     */
+    static void set_consuming(bool consuming);
+    static bool get_consuming();
+
+    /**
+     * Please do NOT directly use boost::dcoroutines::future! It is essential
+     * to maintain the "current" coroutine at every context switch. This
+     * Future wraps the essential boost::dcoroutines::future functionality
+     * with that maintenance.
+     */
+    template <typename T>
+    class Future;
+
 private:
-    friend class LLSingleton<LLCoros>;
     LLCoros();
-    std::string launchImpl(const std::string& prefix, coro* newCoro);
+    friend class LLSingleton<LLCoros>;
+    friend class llcoro::Suspending;
     std::string generateDistinctName(const std::string& prefix) const;
     bool cleanup(const LLSD&);
+    struct CoroData;
+    static void no_cleanup(CoroData*);
+    static void toplevel(coro::self& self, CoroData* data, const callable_t& callable);
+    static CoroData& get_CoroData(const std::string& caller);
 
     S32 mStackSize;
-    typedef boost::ptr_map<std::string, coro> CoroMap;
+
+    // coroutine-local storage, as it were: one per coro we track
+    struct CoroData
+    {
+        CoroData(CoroData* prev, const std::string& name,
+                 const callable_t& callable, S32 stacksize);
+
+        // The boost::dcoroutines library supports asymmetric coroutines. Every
+        // time we context switch out of a coroutine, we pass control to the
+        // previously-active one (or to the non-coroutine stack owned by the
+        // thread). So our management of the "current" coroutine must be able to
+        // restore the previous value when we're about to switch away.
+        CoroData* mPrev;
+        // tweaked name of the current coroutine
+        const std::string mName;
+        // the actual coroutine instance
+        LLCoros::coro mCoro;
+        // set_consuming() state
+        bool mConsuming;
+        // When the dcoroutine library calls a top-level callable, it implicitly
+        // passes coro::self& as the first parameter. All our consumer code used
+        // to explicitly pass coro::self& down through all levels of call stack,
+        // because at the leaf level we need it for context-switching. But since
+        // coroutines are based on cooperative switching, we can cause the
+        // top-level entry point to stash a pointer to the currently-running
+        // coroutine, and manage it appropriately as we switch out and back in.
+        // That eliminates the need to pass it as an explicit parameter down
+        // through every level, which is unfortunately viral in nature. Finding it
+        // implicitly rather than explicitly allows minor maintenance in which a
+        // leaf-level function adds a new async I/O call that suspends the calling
+        // coroutine, WITHOUT having to propagate coro::self& through every
+        // function signature down to that point -- and of course through every
+        // other caller of every such function.
+        LLCoros::coro::self* mSelf;
+    };
+    typedef boost::ptr_map<std::string, CoroData> CoroMap;
     CoroMap mCoros;
+
+    // identify the current coroutine's CoroData
+    static boost::thread_specific_ptr<LLCoros::CoroData> sCurrentCoro;
+};
+
+namespace llcoro
+{
+
+/// Instantiate one of these in a block surrounding any leaf point when
+/// control literally switches away from this coroutine.
+class Suspending
+{
+public:
+    Suspending();
+    ~Suspending();
+
+private:
+    LLCoros::CoroData* mSuspended;
+};
+
+} // namespace llcoro
+
+template <typename T>
+class LLCoros::Future
+{
+    typedef boost::dcoroutines::future<T> dfuture;
+
+public:
+    Future():
+        mFuture(get_self())
+    {}
+
+    typedef typename boost::dcoroutines::make_callback_result<dfuture>::type callback_t;
+
+    callback_t make_callback()
+    {
+        return boost::dcoroutines::make_callback(mFuture);
+    }
+
+#ifndef LL_LINUX
+    explicit
+#endif
+    operator bool() const
+    {
+        return bool(mFuture);
+    }
+
+    bool operator!() const
+    {
+        return ! mFuture;
+    }
+
+    T get()
+    {
+        // instantiate Suspending to manage the "current" coroutine
+        llcoro::Suspending suspended;
+        return *mFuture;
+    }
+
+private:
+    dfuture mFuture;
 };
 
 #endif /* ! defined(LL_LLCOROS_H) */