diff options
author | nat-goodspeed <nat@lindenlab.com> | 2024-09-05 14:30:27 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-09-05 14:30:27 -0400 |
commit | 18d81e20f0b0044c16615953d7b69d7fb34d3449 (patch) | |
tree | 2b3f02ad060c0f4a55f2ff8b3ec53dc3f3b8f60b /indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua | |
parent | 7ac4c3b56e5246fceaa73e7c9c665d3c04827d6c (diff) | |
parent | 49bf86b52459b183d3988388dbb74d8888a71925 (diff) |
Merge pull request #2451 from secondlife/lua-resultset
Give certain `LLInventoryListener` queries an API based on result sets.
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua')
-rw-r--r-- | indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua b/indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5301d7838c --- /dev/null +++ b/indra/newview/scripts/lua/require/result_view.lua @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +local leap = require 'leap' + +-- metatable for every result_view() table +local mt = { + __len = function(self) + return self.length + end, + __index = function(self, i) + -- right away, convert to 0-relative indexing + i -= 1 + -- can we find this index within the current slice? + local reli = i - self.start + if 0 <= reli and reli < #self.slice then + -- Lua 1-relative indexing + return self.slice[reli + 1] + end + -- is this index outside the overall result set? + if not (0 <= i and i < self.length) then + return nil + end + -- fetch a new slice starting at i, using provided fetch() + local start + self.slice, start = self.fetch(self.key, i) + -- It's possible that caller-provided fetch() function forgot + -- to return the adjusted start index of the new slice. In + -- Lua, 0 tests as true, so if fetch() returned (slice, 0), + -- we'll duly reset self.start to 0. Otherwise, assume the + -- requested index was not adjusted: that the returned slice + -- really does start at i. + self.start = start or i + -- Hopefully this slice contains the desired i. + -- Back to 1-relative indexing. + return self.slice[i - self.start + 1] + end, + -- We purposely avoid putting any array entries (int keys) into + -- our table so that access to any int key will always call our + -- __index() metamethod. Moreover, we want any table iteration to + -- call __index(table, i) however many times; we do NOT want it to + -- retrieve key, length, start, slice. + -- So turn 'for k, v in result' into 'for k, v in ipairs(result)'. + __iter = ipairs, + -- This result set provides read-only access. + -- We do not support pushing updates to individual items back to + -- C++; for the intended use cases, that makes no sense. + __newindex = function(self, i, value) + error("result_view is a read-only data structure", 2) + end +} + +-- result_view(key_length, fetch) returns a table which stores only a slice +-- of a result set plus some control values, yet presents read-only virtual +-- access to the entire result set. +-- key_length: {result set key, total result set length} +-- fetch: function(key, start) that returns (slice, adjusted start) +local result_view = setmetatable( + { + -- generic fetch() function + fetch = function(key, start) + local fetched = leap.request( + 'LLInventory', + {op='getSlice', result=key, index=start}) + return fetched.slice, fetched.start + end, + -- generic close() function accepting variadic result-set keys + close = function(...) + local keys = table.pack(...) + -- table.pack() produces a table with an array entry for every + -- parameter, PLUS an 'n' key with the count. Unfortunately that + -- 'n' key bollixes our conversion to LLSD, which requires either + -- all int keys (for an array) or all string keys (for a map). + keys.n = nil + leap.send('LLInventory', {op='closeResult', result=keys}) + end + }, + { + -- result_view(key_length, fetch) calls this + __call = function(class, key_length, fetch) + return setmetatable( + { + key=key_length[1], + length=key_length[2], + -- C++ result sets use 0-based indexing, so internally we do too + start=0, + -- start with a dummy array with length 0 + slice={}, + -- if caller didn't pass fetch() function, use generic + fetch=fetch or class.fetch, + -- returned view:close() will close result set with passed key + close=function(self) class.close(key_length[1]) end + }, + -- use our special metatable + mt + ) + end + } +) + +return result_view |