Merged latest viewer/viewer-20 into login-api.

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/indra/newview/llxmlrpctransaction.cpp b/indra/newview/llxmlrpctransaction.cpp
index a2fd0f0d9c..0e1beb377f 100644
--- a/indra/newview/llxmlrpctransaction.cpp
+++ b/indra/newview/llxmlrpctransaction.cpp
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "llviewerprecompiledheaders.h"
 
 #include "llxmlrpctransaction.h"
+#include "llxmlrpclistener.h"
 
 #include "llcurl.h"
 #include "llviewercontrol.h"
@@ -42,6 +43,13 @@
 
 #include "llappviewer.h"
 
+// Static instance of LLXMLRPCListener declared here so that every time we
+// bring in this code, we instantiate a listener. If we put the static
+// instance of LLXMLRPCListener into llxmlrpclistener.cpp, the linker would
+// simply omit llxmlrpclistener.o, and shouting on the LLEventPump would do
+// nothing.
+static LLXMLRPCListener listener("LLXMLRPCTransaction");
+
 LLXMLRPCValue LLXMLRPCValue::operator[](const char* id) const
 {
 	return LLXMLRPCValue(XMLRPC_VectorGetValueWithID(mV, id));
@@ -213,6 +221,11 @@ LLXMLRPCTransaction::Impl::Impl(const std::string& uri,
 	XMLRPC_RequestSetData(request, params.getValue());
 	
 	init(request, useGzip);
+    // DEV-28398: without this XMLRPC_RequestFree() call, it looks as though
+    // the 'request' object is simply leaked. It's less clear to me whether we
+    // should also ask to free request value data (second param 1), since the
+    // data come from 'params'.
+    XMLRPC_RequestFree(request, 1);
 }