summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNat Goodspeed <nat@lindenlab.com>2015-08-18 17:05:29 -0400
committerNat Goodspeed <nat@lindenlab.com>2015-08-18 17:05:29 -0400
commit62527e6f18f0a035a234cf584e31f7eea93fd4a7 (patch)
tree29f532cde7b0cf0fbf96cd4def3c89c77717b8fb /indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp
parent02b7e7ce07948a25bc1f58fdbfe3499dc917340f (diff)
MAINT-5506: Fix ugly timing bug in llurlentry static initialization.
The problem was that class-static LLUrlEntryParcel::sRegionHost was being initialized by copying class-static LLHost::invalid. Naturally, these two statics are initialized in different source files. Since C++ makes no promises about the relative order in which objects in different object files are initialized, it seems we hit a case in which we were trying to initialize sRegionHost by copying a completely uninitialized LLHost::invalid. In general we might attempt to address such cross-translation-unit issues by introducing an LLSingleton. But in this particular case, the punch line is that LLHost::invalid is explicitly constructed identically to a default-constructed LLHost! In other words, LLHost::invalid provides nothing we couldn't get from LLHost(). All it gives us is an opportunity for glitches such as the above. Remove LLHost::invalid and all references, replacing with LLHost().
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp')
-rwxr-xr-xindra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp b/indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp
index 11a503e71f..b6210bdc6b 100755
--- a/indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp
+++ b/indra/newview/llpreviewscript.cpp
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ void LLPreviewLSL::loadAsset()
if (gAgent.isGodlike() || (is_copyable && (is_modifiable || is_library)))
{
LLUUID* new_uuid = new LLUUID(mItemUUID);
- gAssetStorage->getInvItemAsset(LLHost::invalid,
+ gAssetStorage->getInvItemAsset(LLHost(),
gAgent.getID(),
gAgent.getSessionID(),
item->getPermissions().getOwner(),