/** * @file llleap_test.cpp * @author Nat Goodspeed * @date 2012-02-21 * @brief Test for llleap. * * $LicenseInfo:firstyear=2012&license=viewerlgpl$ * Copyright (c) 2012, Linden Research, Inc. * $/LicenseInfo$ */ // Precompiled header #include "linden_common.h" // associated header #include "llleap.h" // STL headers // std headers #include // external library headers // other Linden headers #include "../test/lltut.h" #include "../test/namedtempfile.h" #include "../test/catch_and_store_what_in.h" #include "wrapllerrs.h" // CaptureLog #include "llevents.h" #include "llprocess.h" #include "llstring.h" #include "stringize.h" #include "StringVec.h" #if defined(LL_WINDOWS) #define sleep(secs) _sleep((secs) * 1000) // WOLF-300: It appears that driving a megabyte of data through an LLLeap pipe // causes Windows abdominal pain such that it later fails code-signing in some // mysterious way. Entirely suppressing these LLLeap tests pushes the failure // rate MUCH lower. Can we re-enable them with a smaller data size on Windows? const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 1023*1024; #else // not Windows const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 1023*1024; // try wrangling just under a megabyte of data #endif // capture std::weak_ptrs to LLLeap instances so we can tell when they expire typedef std::vector> LLLeapVector; void waitfor(const LLLeapVector& instances, int timeout=60) { int i; for (i = 0; i < timeout; ++i) { // Every iteration, test whether any of the passed LLLeap instances // still exist (are still running). bool found = false; for (auto& ptr : instances) { if (! ptr.expired()) { found = true; break; } } // If we made it through all of 'instances' without finding one that's // still running, we're done. if (! found) { /*==========================================================================*| std::cout << instances.size() << " LLLeap instances terminated in " << i << " seconds, proceeding" << std::endl; |*==========================================================================*/ return; } // Found an instance that's still running. Wait and pump LLProcess. sleep(1); LLEventPumps::instance().obtain("mainloop").post(LLSD()); } tut::ensure(STRINGIZE("at least 1 of " << instances.size() << " LLLeap instances timed out (" << timeout << " seconds) without terminating"), i < timeout); } void waitfor(LLLeap* instance, int timeout=60) { LLLeapVector instances; instances.push_back(instance->getWeak()); waitfor(instances, timeout); } /***************************************************************************** * TUT *****************************************************************************/ namespace tut { struct llleap_data { llleap_data(): reader(".py", // This logic is adapted from vita.viewerclient.receiveEvent() [](std::ostream& out){ out << "import re\n" "import os\n" "import sys\n" "\n" "import llsd\n" "\n" "class ProtocolError(Exception):\n" " def __init__(self, msg, data):\n" " Exception.__init__(self, msg)\n" " self.data = data\n" "\n" "class ParseError(ProtocolError):\n" " pass\n" "\n" "def get():\n" " hdr = []\n" " while b':' not in hdr and len(hdr) < 20:\n" " hdr.append(sys.stdin.buffer.read(1))\n" " if not hdr:\n" " sys.exit(0)\n" " if not hdr[-1] == b':':\n" " raise ProtocolError('Expected len:data, got %r' % hdr, hdr)\n" " try:\n" " length = int(b''.join(hdr[:-1]))\n" " except ValueError:\n" " raise ProtocolError('Non-numeric len %r' % hdr[:-1], hdr[:-1])\n" " parts = []\n" " received = 0\n" " while received < length:\n" " parts.append(sys.stdin.buffer.read(length - received))\n" " received += len(parts[-1])\n" " data = b''.join(parts)\n" " assert len(data) == length\n" " try:\n" " return llsd.parse(data)\n" // Seems the old indra.base.llsd module didn't properly // convert IndexError (from running off end of string) to // LLSDParseError. " except (IndexError, llsd.LLSDParseError) as e:\n" " msg = 'Bad received packet (%s)' % e\n" " print('%s, %s bytes:' % (msg, len(data)), file=sys.stderr)\n" " showmax = 40\n" // We've observed failures with very large packets; // dumping the entire packet wastes time and space. // But if the error states a particular byte offset, // truncate to (near) that offset when dumping data. " location = re.search(r' at (byte|index) ([0-9]+)', str(e))\n" " if not location:\n" " # didn't find offset, dump whole thing, no ellipsis\n" " ellipsis = ''\n" " else:\n" " # found offset within error message\n" " trunc = int(location.group(2)) + showmax\n" " data = data[:trunc]\n" " ellipsis = '... (%s more)' % (length - trunc)\n" " offset = -showmax\n" " for offset in range(0, len(data)-showmax, showmax):\n" " print('%04d: %r +' % \\\n" " (offset, data[offset:offset+showmax]), file=sys.stderr)\n" " offset += showmax\n" " print('%04d: %r%s' % \\\n" " (offset, data[offset:], ellipsis), file=sys.stderr)\n" " raise ParseError(msg, data)\n" "\n" "# deal with initial stdin message\n" // this will throw if the initial write to stdin doesn't // follow len:data protocol, or if we couldn't find 'pump' // in the dict "_reply = get()['pump']\n" "\n" "def replypump():\n" " return _reply\n" "\n" "def put(req):\n" " sys.stdout.buffer.write(b'%d:%b' % (len(req), req))\n" " sys.stdout.flush()\n" "\n" "def send(pump, data):\n" " put(llsd.format_notation(dict(pump=pump, data=data)))\n" "\n" "def request(pump, data):\n" " # we expect 'data' is a dict\n" " data['reply'] = _reply\n" " send(pump, data)\n";}), // Get the actual pathname of the NamedExtTempFile and trim off // the ".py" extension. (We could cache reader.getName() in a // separate member variable, but I happen to know getName() just // returns a NamedExtTempFile member rather than performing any // computation, so I don't mind calling it twice.) Then take the // basename. reader_module(LLProcess::basename( reader.getName().substr(0, reader.getName().length()-3))), PYTHON(LLStringUtil::getenv("PYTHON")) { ensure("Set PYTHON to interpreter pathname", !PYTHON.empty()); } NamedExtTempFile reader; const std::string reader_module; const std::string PYTHON; }; typedef test_group llleap_group; typedef llleap_group::object object; llleap_group llleapgrp("llleap"); template<> template<> void object::test<1>() { set_test_name("multiple LLLeap instances"); NamedExtTempFile script("py", "import time\n" "time.sleep(1)\n"); LLLeapVector instances; instances.push_back(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})->getWeak()); instances.push_back(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})->getWeak()); // In this case we're simply establishing that two LLLeap instances // can coexist without throwing exceptions or bombing in any other // way. Wait for them to terminate. waitfor(instances); } template<> template<> void object::test<2>() { set_test_name("stderr to log"); NamedExtTempFile script("py", "import sys\n" "sys.stderr.write('''Hello from Python!\n" "note partial line''')\n"); StringVec vcommand{ PYTHON, script.getName() }; CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_INFO); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), vcommand)); log.messageWith("Hello from Python!"); log.messageWith("note partial line"); } template<> template<> void object::test<3>() { set_test_name("bad stdout protocol"); NamedExtTempFile script("py", "print('Hello from Python!')\n"); CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})); ensure_contains("error log line", log.messageWith("invalid protocol"), "Hello from Python!"); } template<> template<> void object::test<4>() { set_test_name("leftover stdout"); NamedExtTempFile script("py", "import sys\n" // note lack of newline "sys.stdout.write('Hello from Python!')\n"); CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})); ensure_contains("error log line", log.messageWith("Discarding"), "Hello from Python!"); } template<> template<> void object::test<5>() { set_test_name("bad stdout len prefix"); NamedExtTempFile script("py", "import sys\n" "sys.stdout.write('5a2:something')\n"); CaptureLog log(LLError::LEVEL_WARN); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})); ensure_contains("error log line", log.messageWith("invalid protocol"), "5a2:"); } template<> template<> void object::test<6>() { set_test_name("empty plugin vector"); std::string threw = catch_what([](){ LLLeap::create("empty", StringVec()); }); ensure_contains("LLLeap::Error", threw, "no plugin"); // try the suppress-exception variant ensure("bad launch returned non-NULL", ! LLLeap::create("empty", StringVec(), false)); } template<> template<> void object::test<7>() { set_test_name("bad launch"); // Synthesize bogus executable name std::string BADPYTHON(PYTHON.substr(0, PYTHON.length()-1) + "x"); CaptureLog log; std::string threw = catch_what([&BADPYTHON](){ LLLeap::create("bad exe", BADPYTHON); }); ensure_contains("LLLeap::create() didn't throw", threw, "failed"); log.messageWith("failed"); log.messageWith(BADPYTHON); // try the suppress-exception variant ensure("bad launch returned non-NULL", ! LLLeap::create("bad exe", BADPYTHON, false)); } // Generic self-contained listener: derive from this and override its // call() method, then tell somebody to post on the pump named getName(). // Control will reach your call() override. struct ListenerBase { // Pass the pump name you want; will tweak for uniqueness. ListenerBase(const std::string& name): mPump(name, true) { mPump.listen(name, boost::bind(&ListenerBase::call, this, _1)); } virtual ~ListenerBase() {} // pacify MSVC virtual bool call(const LLSD& request) { return false; } LLEventPump& getPump() { return mPump; } const LLEventPump& getPump() const { return mPump; } std::string getName() const { return mPump.getName(); } void post(const LLSD& data) { mPump.post(data); } LLEventStream mPump; }; // Mimic a dummy little LLEventAPI that merely sends a reply back to its // requester on the "reply" pump. struct AckAPI: public ListenerBase { AckAPI(): ListenerBase("AckAPI") {} virtual bool call(const LLSD& request) { LLEventPumps::instance().obtain(request["reply"]).post("ack"); return false; } }; // Give LLLeap script a way to post success/failure. struct Result: public ListenerBase { Result(): ListenerBase("Result") {} virtual bool call(const LLSD& request) { mData = request; return false; } void ensure() const { tut::ensure(std::string("never posted to ") + getName(), mData.isDefined()); // Post an empty string for success, non-empty string is failure message. tut::ensure(mData, mData.asString().empty()); } LLSD mData; }; template<> template<> void object::test<8>() { set_test_name("round trip"); AckAPI api; Result result; NamedExtTempFile script("py", [&](std::ostream& out){ out << "from " << reader_module << " import *\n" // make a request on our little API "request(pump='" << api.getName() << "', data={})\n" // wait for its response "resp = get()\n" "result = '' if resp == dict(pump=replypump(), data='ack')\\\n" " else 'bad: ' + str(resp)\n" "send(pump='" << result.getName() << "', data=result)\n";}); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()})); result.ensure(); } struct ReqIDAPI: public ListenerBase { ReqIDAPI(): ListenerBase("ReqIDAPI") {} virtual bool call(const LLSD& request) { // free function from llevents.h sendReply(LLSD(), request); return false; } }; template<> template<> void object::test<9>() { set_test_name("many small messages"); // It's not clear to me whether there's value in iterating many times // over a send/receive loop -- I don't think that will exercise any // interesting corner cases. This test first sends a large number of // messages, then receives all the responses. The intent is to ensure // that some of that data stream crosses buffer boundaries, loop // iterations etc. in OS pipes and the LLLeap/LLProcess implementation. ReqIDAPI api; Result result; NamedExtTempFile script("py", [&](std::ostream& out){ out << "import sys\n" "from " << reader_module << " import *\n" // Note that since reader imports llsd, this // 'import *' gets us llsd too. "sample = llsd.format_notation(dict(pump='" << api.getName() << "', data=dict(reqid=999999, reply=replypump())))\n" // The whole packet has length prefix too: "len:data" "samplen = len(str(len(sample))) + 1 + len(sample)\n" // guess how many messages it will take to // accumulate BUFFERED_LENGTH "count = int(" << BUFFERED_LENGTH << "/samplen)\n" "print('Sending %s requests' % count, file=sys.stderr)\n" "for i in range(count):\n" " request('" << api.getName() << "', dict(reqid=i))\n" // The assumption in this specific test that // replies will arrive in the same order as // requests is ONLY valid because the API we're // invoking sends replies instantly. If the API // had to wait for some external event before // sending its reply, replies could arrive in // arbitrary order, and we'd have to tick them // off from a set. "result = ''\n" "for i in range(count):\n" " resp = get()\n" " if resp['data']['reqid'] != i:\n" " result = 'expected reqid=%s in %s' % (i, resp)\n" " break\n" "send(pump='" << result.getName() << "', data=result)\n";}); waitfor(LLLeap::create(get_test_name(), StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName()}), 300); // needs more realtime than most tests result.ensure(); } // This is the body of test<10>, extracted so we can run it over a number // of large-message sizes. void test_large_message(const std::string& PYTHON, const std::string& reader_module, const std::string& test_name, size_t size) { ReqIDAPI api; Result result; NamedExtTempFile script("py", [&](std::ostream& out){ out << "import sys\n" "from " << reader_module << " import *\n" // Generate a very large string value. "desired = int(sys.argv[1])\n" // 7 chars per item: 6 digits, 1 comma "count = int((desired - 50)/7)\n" "large = ''.join('%06d,' % i for i in range(count))\n" // Pass 'large' as reqid because we know the API // will echo reqid, and we want to receive it back. "request('" << api.getName() << "', dict(reqid=large))\n" "try:\n" " resp = get()\n" "except ParseError as e:\n" " # try to find where e.data diverges from expectation\n" // Normally we'd expect a 'pump' key in there, // too, with value replypump(). But Python // serializes keys in a different order than C++, // so incoming data start with 'data'. // Truthfully, though, if we get as far as 'pump' // before we find a difference, something's very // strange. " expect = llsd.format_notation(dict(data=dict(reqid=large)))\n" " chunk = 40\n" " for offset in range(0, max(len(e.data), len(expect)), chunk):\n" " if e.data[offset:offset+chunk] != \\\n" " expect[offset:offset+chunk]:\n" " print('Offset %06d: expect %r,\\n'\\\n" " ' get %r' %\\\n" " (offset,\n" " expect[offset:offset+chunk],\n" " e.data[offset:offset+chunk]),\n" " file=sys.stderr)\n" " break\n" " else:\n" " print('incoming data matches expect?!', file=sys.stderr)\n" " send('" << result.getName() << "', '%s: %s' % (e.__class__.__name__, e))\n" " sys.exit(1)\n" "\n" "echoed = resp['data']['reqid']\n" "if echoed == large:\n" " send('" << result.getName() << "', '')\n" " sys.exit(0)\n" // Here we know echoed did NOT match; try to find where "for i in range(count):\n" " start = 7*i\n" " end = 7*(i+1)\n" " if end > len(echoed)\\\n" " or echoed[start:end] != large[start:end]:\n" " send('" << result.getName() << "',\n" " 'at offset %s, expected %r but got %r' %\n" " (start, large[start:end], echoed[start:end]))\n" "sys.exit(1)\n";}); waitfor(LLLeap::create(test_name, StringVec{PYTHON, script.getName(), stringize(size)}), 180); // try a longer timeout result.ensure(); } struct TestLargeMessage { TestLargeMessage(const std::string& PYTHON_, const std::string& reader_module_, const std::string& test_name_): PYTHON(PYTHON_), reader_module(reader_module_), test_name(test_name_) {} bool operator()(size_t left, size_t right) const { // We don't know whether upper_bound is going to pass the "sought // value" as the left or the right operand. We pass 0 as the // "sought value" so we can distinguish it. Of course that means // the sequence we're searching must not itself contain 0! size_t size; bool success; if (left) { size = left; // Consider our return value carefully. Normal binary_search // (or, in our case, upper_bound) expects a container sorted // in ascending order, and defaults to the std::less // comparator. Our container is in fact in ascending order, so // return consistently with std::less. Here we were called as // compare(item, sought). If std::less were called that way, // 'true' would mean to move right (to higher numbers) within // the sequence: the item being considered is less than the // sought value. For us, that means that test_large_message() // success should return 'true'. success = true; } else { size = right; // Here we were called as compare(sought, item). If std::less // were called that way, 'true' would mean to move left (to // lower numbers) within the sequence: the sought value is // less than the item being considered. For us, that means // test_large_message() FAILURE should return 'true', hence // test_large_message() success should return 'false'. success = false; } try { test_large_message(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, size); std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") succeeded" << std::endl; return success; } catch (const failure& e) { std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") failed: " << e.what() << std::endl; return ! success; } } const std::string PYTHON, reader_module, test_name; }; // The point of this function is to try to find a size at which // test_large_message() can succeed. We still want the overall test to // fail; otherwise we won't get the coder's attention -- but if // test_large_message() fails, try to find a plausible size at which it // DOES work. void test_or_split(const std::string& PYTHON, const std::string& reader_module, const std::string& test_name, size_t size) { try { test_large_message(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, size); } catch (const failure& e) { std::cout << "test_large_message(" << size << ") failed: " << e.what() << std::endl; // If it still fails below 4K, give up: subdividing any further is // pointless. if (size >= 4096) { try { // Recur with half the size size_t smaller(size/2); test_or_split(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name, smaller); // Recursive call will throw if test_large_message() // failed, therefore we only reach the line below if it // succeeded. std::cout << "but test_large_message(" << smaller << ") succeeded" << std::endl; // Binary search for largest size that works. But since // std::binary_search() only returns bool, actually use // std::upper_bound(), consistent with our desire to find // the LARGEST size that works. First generate a sorted // container of all the sizes we intend to try, from // 'smaller' (known to work) to 'size' (known to fail). We // could whomp up magic iterators to do this dynamically, // without actually instantiating a vector, but for a test // program this will do. At least preallocate the vector. // Per TestLargeMessage comments, it's important that this // vector not contain 0. std::vector sizes; sizes.reserve((size - smaller)/4096 + 1); for (size_t sz(smaller), szend(size); sz < szend; sz += 4096) sizes.push_back(sz); // our comparator TestLargeMessage tester(PYTHON, reader_module, test_name); // Per TestLargeMessage comments, pass 0 as the sought value. std::vector::const_iterator found = std::upper_bound(sizes.begin(), sizes.end(), 0, tester); if (found != sizes.end() && found != sizes.begin()) { std::cout << "test_large_message(" << *(found - 1) << ") is largest that succeeds" << std::endl; } else { std::cout << "cannot determine largest test_large_message(size) " << "that succeeds" << std::endl; } } catch (const failure&) { // The recursive test_or_split() call above has already // handled the exception. We don't want our caller to see // innermost exception; propagate outermost (below). } } // In any case, because we reached here through failure of // our original test_large_message(size) call, ensure failure // propagates. throw e; } } template<> template<> void object::test<10>() { set_test_name("very large message"); test_or_split(PYTHON, reader_module, get_test_name(), BUFFERED_LENGTH); } } // namespace tut