From 2ccbb77f3c3ed0965c341814daec43a666592e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nat Goodspeed Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:22:57 -0500 Subject: WOLF-300: Try using a smaller data volume for LLLeap tests on Windows. --- indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'indra/llcommon/tests') diff --git a/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp b/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp index 2d88e2c676..d342dece84 100755 --- a/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp +++ b/indra/llcommon/tests/llleap_test.cpp @@ -36,10 +36,18 @@ StringVec sv(const StringVec& listof) { return listof; } #if defined(LL_WINDOWS) #define sleep(secs) _sleep((secs) * 1000) -#endif +// WOLF-300: It appears that driving a megabyte of data through an LLLeap pipe +// causes Windows abdominal pain such that it later fails code-signing in some +// mysterious way. Entirely suppressing these LLLeap tests pushes the failure +// rate MUCH lower. Can we re-enable them with a smaller data size on Windows? +const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 100*1024; + +#else // not Windows const size_t BUFFERED_LENGTH = 1023*1024; // try wrangling just under a megabyte of data +#endif + void waitfor(const std::vector& instances, int timeout=60) { int i; -- cgit v1.2.3