From 651353560bfe23b6423ecf7690d86645a71c0cbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nat Goodspeed Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:56:10 -0400 Subject: SL-20476: Don't let the compiler know we intend to crash. clang has gotten smart enough to recognize an inline attempt to store to address zero. Fool it by storing to an address passed as a parameter, and pass nullptr from a different source file. --- indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp') diff --git a/indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp b/indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp index 02cb186275..05e719b494 100644 --- a/indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp +++ b/indra/llcommon/llerror.cpp @@ -1617,5 +1617,18 @@ bool debugLoggingEnabled(const std::string& tag) return res; } - - +void crashdriver(void (*callback)(int*)) +{ + // The LLERROR_CRASH macro used to have inline code of the form: + //int* make_me_crash = NULL; + //*make_me_crash = 0; + + // But compilers are getting smart enough to recognize that, so we must + // assign to an address supplied by a separate source file. We could do + // the assignment here in crashdriver() -- but then BugSplat would group + // all LL_ERRS() crashes as the fault of this one function, instead of + // identifying the specific LL_ERRS() source line. So instead, do the + // assignment in a lambda in the caller's source. We just provide the + // nullptr target. + callback(nullptr); +} -- cgit v1.2.3