summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/llmessage/llcoproceduremanager.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-25DRTVWR-476: Introduce LLCoprocedureManager::close(). Use in tests.Nat Goodspeed
The new close(void) method simply acquires the logic from ~LLCoprocedureManager() (which now calls close()). It's useful, even if only in test programs, to be able to shut down all existing LLCoprocedurePools without having to name them individually -- and without having to destroy the LLCoprocedureManager singleton instance. Deleting an LLSingleton should be done only once per process, whereas test programs want to reset the LLCoprocedureManager after each test.
2020-03-25DRTVWR-476: Use shared_ptr to manage lifespan of coprocedure queue.Nat Goodspeed
Since the consuming coroutine LLCoprocedurePool::coprocedureInvokerCoro() has been observed to outlive the LLCoprocedurePool instance that owns the CoprocQueue_t, closing that queue isn't enough to keep the coroutine from crashing at shutdown: accessing a deleted CoprocQueue_t is fatal whether or not it's been closed. Make LLCoprocedurePool store a shared_ptr to a heap CoprocQueue_t instance, and pass that shared_ptr by value to consuming coroutines. That way the CoprocQueue_t instance is guaranteed to live as long as the last interested party.
2020-03-25Improved shutdown behavior of LLCoprocedureManagerBrad Kittenbrink
2020-03-25First draft of boost::fibers::unbuffered_channel based implementation of ↵Brad Kittenbrink
LLCoprocedureManager
2020-03-25SL-793: Use Boost.Fiber instead of the "dcoroutine" library.Nat Goodspeed
Longtime fans will remember that the "dcoroutine" library is a Google Summer of Code project by Giovanni P. Deretta. He originally called it "Boost.Coroutine," and we originally added it to our 3p-boost autobuild package as such. But when the official Boost.Coroutine library came along (with a very different API), and we still needed the API of the GSoC project, we renamed the unofficial one "dcoroutine" to allow coexistence. The "dcoroutine" library had an internal low-level API more or less analogous to Boost.Context. We later introduced an implementation of that internal API based on Boost.Context, a step towards eliminating the GSoC code in favor of official, supported Boost code. However, recent versions of Boost.Context no longer support the API on which we built the shim for "dcoroutine." We started down the path of reimplementing that shim using the current Boost.Context API -- then realized that it's time to bite the bullet and replace the "dcoroutine" API with the Boost.Fiber API, which we've been itching to do for literally years now. Naturally, most of the heavy lifting is in llcoros.{h,cpp} and lleventcoro.{h,cpp} -- which is good: the LLCoros layer abstracts away most of the differences between "dcoroutine" and Boost.Fiber. The one feature Boost.Fiber does not provide is the ability to forcibly terminate some other fiber. Accordingly, disable LLCoros::kill() and LLCoprocedureManager::shutdown(). The only known shutdown() call was in LLCoprocedurePool's destructor. We also took the opportunity to remove postAndSuspend2() and its associated machinery: FutureListener2, LLErrorEvent, errorException(), errorLog(), LLCoroEventPumps. All that dual-LLEventPump stuff was introduced at a time when the Responder pattern was king, and we assumed we'd want to listen on one LLEventPump with the success handler and on another with the error handler. We have never actually used that in practice. Remove associated tests, of course. There is one other semantic difference that necessitates patching a number of tests: with "dcoroutine," fulfilling a future IMMEDIATELY resumes the waiting coroutine. With Boost.Fiber, fulfilling a future merely marks the fiber as ready to resume next time the scheduler gets around to it. To observe the test side effects, we've inserted a number of llcoro::suspend() calls -- also in the main loop. For a long time we retained a single unit test exercising the raw "dcoroutine" API. Remove that. Eliminate llcoro_get_id.{h,cpp}, which provided llcoro::get_id(), which was a hack to emulate fiber-local variables. Since Boost.Fiber has an actual API for that, remove the hack. In fact, use (new alias) LLCoros::local_ptr for LLSingleton's dependency tracking in place of llcoro::get_id(). In CMake land, replace BOOST_COROUTINE_LIBRARY with BOOST_FIBER_LIBRARY. We don't actually use the Boost.Coroutine for anything (though there exist plausible use cases).
2016-09-15MAINT-5232: Normalize LLSingleton subclasses.Nat Goodspeed
A shocking number of LLSingleton subclasses had public constructors -- and in several instances, were being explicitly instantiated independently of the LLSingleton machinery. This breaks the new LLSingleton dependency-tracking machinery. It seems only fair that if you say you want an LLSingleton, there should only be ONE INSTANCE! Introduce LLSINGLETON() and LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR() macros. These handle the friend class LLSingleton<whatevah>; and explicitly declare a private nullary constructor. To try to enforce the LLSINGLETON() convention, introduce a new pure virtual LLSingleton method you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() which is, as you might suspect, defined by the macro. If you declare an LLSingleton subclass without using LLSINGLETON() or LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR() in the class body, you can't instantiate the subclass for lack of a you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() implementation -- which will hopefully remind the coder. Trawl through ALL LLSingleton subclass definitions, sprinkling in LLSINGLETON() or LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR() as appropriate. Remove all explicit constructor declarations, public or private, along with relevant 'friend class LLSingleton<myself>' declarations. Where destructors are declared, move them into private section as well. Where the constructor was inline but nontrivial, move out of class body. Fix several LLSingleton abuses revealed by making ctors/dtors private: LLGlobalEconomy was both an LLSingleton and the base class for LLRegionEconomy, a non-LLSingleton. (Therefore every LLRegionEconomy instance contained another instance of the LLGlobalEconomy "singleton.") Extract LLBaseEconomy; LLGlobalEconomy is now a trivial subclass of that. LLRegionEconomy, as you might suspect, now derives from LLBaseEconomy. LLToolGrab, an LLSingleton, was also explicitly instantiated by LLToolCompGun's constructor. Extract LLToolGrabBase, explicitly instantiated, with trivial subclass LLToolGrab, the LLSingleton instance. (WARNING: LLToolGrabBase methods have an unnerving tendency to go after LLToolGrab::getInstance(). I DO NOT KNOW what should be the relationship between the instance in LLToolCompGun and the LLToolGrab singleton instance.) LLGridManager declared a variant constructor accepting (const std::string&), with the comment: // initialize with an explicity grid file for testing. As there is no evidence of this being called from anywhere, delete it. LLChicletBar's constructor accepted an optional (const LLSD&). As the LLSD parameter wasn't used, and as there is no evidence of it being passed from anywhere, delete the parameter. LLViewerWindow::shutdownViews() was checking LLNavigationBar:: instanceExists(), then deleting its getInstance() pointer -- leaving a dangling LLSingleton instance pointer, a land mine if any subsequent code should attempt to reference it. Use deleteSingleton() instead. ~LLAppViewer() was calling LLViewerEventRecorder::instance() and then explicitly calling ~LLViewerEventRecorder() on that instance -- leaving the LLSingleton instance pointer pointing to an allocated-but-destroyed instance. Use deleteSingleton() instead.
2015-09-01MAINT-5575: Convert the Experience cache into a coro based singleton.Rider Linden
--HG-- branch : MAINT-5575