summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/llcommon
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2011-03-11sync up to latest viewer-developmentOz Linden
2011-03-11sync up to latest viewer-developmentOz Linden
2011-03-11Automated merge up from viewer-development into mesh-developmentLoren Shih
2011-03-10STORM-987 : Took Vadim's comment into account: check arguments consistency, ↵Merov Linden
make sure remaining perf data are flushed on exit.
2011-03-10increment version to 2.5.3Oz Linden
2011-03-09Pull from viewer-developmentMerov Linden
2011-03-09Fix for "doubleton" error using LLInstanceTracker across shared library ↵brad kittenbrink
boundaries.
2011-03-09Merge with tip of http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-development (rev 14798)callum
2011-03-09Automated merge up from viewer-development into mesh-developmentLoren Shih
2011-03-08STORM-987 : Add --logmetrics and --analyzeperformance arguments, moved ↵Merov Linden
analyzeMetricPerformanceLog() and doAnalysisMetrics() from LLFastTimerView to LLMetricPerformanceTesterBasic
2011-03-07STORM-1045 : pull into viewer-developmentMerov Linden
2011-03-07Update version number to 2.5.2Merov Linden
2011-03-03Autobuild : fix llcommon tests warning so Mac buildsMerov Linden
2011-03-03merge up from viewer-development and viewer-autobuildOz Linden
2011-03-01Set the version to 2.5.1... Yeap! Back from 2.7.0 (not a misprint)Merov Linden
2011-03-01SOCIAL-595 FIX Global Volume control does not affect volume of MOAP in ↵Richard Linden
minimal skin on Windows made slplugin.exe start with correct working directory (llplugin)
2011-02-18Introduce and use new sendReply() function for LLEventAPI methods.Nat Goodspeed
Each LLEventAPI method that generates a reply needs to extract the name of the reply LLEventPump from the request, typically from a ["reply"] key, copy the ["reqid"] value from request to reply, locate the reply LLEventPump and send the enriched reply object. Encapsulate in sendReply() function before we proliferate doing all that by hand too many more times.
2011-02-18merge changes for viewer-vs2010Oz Linden
2011-02-17Autobuild: fix for Mac build using XCodeMerov Linden
2011-02-17VWR-24917 Use mIsDisplayNameDefault to reduce name redundancy in nearby chat ↵Ardy Lay
history * Clean up changes based upon feedback from reviewers. * Improve comment based upon feedback from reviewers.
2011-02-17Automated merge with ↵Nat Goodspeed
http://pdp47.lindenlab.com/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/brad/viewer-development/
2011-02-16Automated merge with ssh://bitbucket.org/jenn_linden/viewer-vs2010Oz Linden
2011-02-15Automated merge up from viewer-development into mesh-developmentLoren Shih
2011-02-14bump version number to 2.7.0Oz Linden
2011-02-14Automated merge with http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-developmentNat Goodspeed
2011-02-11explicitly import ZLIB.Alain Linden
2011-02-10Automated merge up from viewer-development into mesh-developmentLoren Shih
2011-02-09Add test to call map-style functions with full map/array params.Nat Goodspeed
Test also passes overlong arrays and maps with extraneous keys; in all cases we expect the same set of values to be passed to the registered functions.
2011-02-09SH-920 Wait for threads to shut down before deleting them -- also, fix some ↵Dave Parks
assertions that were encouraging people to comment out the destruction of LLSignal.
2011-02-07For test purposes, capture at registration each function's Vars*.Nat Goodspeed
We'd introduced FunctionsTriple to associate a pair of registered function names with the Vars* on which those functions should operate. But with more different tests coming up, it became clear that restating the Vars* every time a given function name appeared in any such context was redundant. Instead, extended addf() to accept and store the relevant Vars* for each registered function, be it the global Vars for the free functions and static methods or the stack Vars for the non-static methods. Added varsfor() function to retrieve and validate the Vars* for a given function name. Eliminated array_funcs() function, restating aggregates of names to test as LLSD collections. Where before these were coerced into a separate LLSD map with ["a"] and ["b"] keys, that map can now be part of the original structure.
2011-02-06Untested support for passing array to map-registered function.Nat Goodspeed
An array-registered function has no param names, so you can only pass an array: a map would be meaningless. Initial implementation of map-registered functions assumed that since you CAN pass a map, you MUST pass a map. But in fact it's meaningful to pass an array as well -- for whatever reason -- and easy to implement, so there you are. Tests to follow.
2011-02-06Add test verifying passing LLSD() to const char* parameter.Nat Goodspeed
LLSDParam<const char*> is coded to pass NULL for an isUndefined() LLSD value, so event-based caller can choose whether to pass NULL, "" or whatever string value to such a parameter. Ensure this behavior.
2011-02-05Introduce zipmap() function and use it in place of frequent loops.Nat Goodspeed
One operation we often use is to take an LLSD array of param names, a corresponding LLSD array of values, and create from them a name=value LLSD map. Instead of doing that "by hand" every time, use a function.
2011-02-05Make array-funcs success test exercise args-array-too-long case too.Nat Goodspeed
Streamline a bit more redundancy from the code in that test.
2011-02-05Consolidate paramsa, paramsb, et al., into ["a"], ["b"] arrays.Nat Goodspeed
Following the C++ convention of having two distinct somethigna, somethingb names, initially we introduced paramsa, paramsb LLSD arrays, following that convention all the way down the line. This led to two distinct loops every time we wanted to walk both arrays, since we didn't want to assume that they were both the same size. But leveraging the fact that distinct LLSD arrays stored in the same LLSD container can in fact be of different lengths, refactored all the pairs of vars into top-level LLSD maps keyed by ["a"] and ["b"]. That lets us perform nested loops rather than duplicating the logic, making test code much less messy.
2011-02-05Fix Vars::cp dangling-pointer problem.Nat Goodspeed
Naively storing a const char* param in a const char* data member ignores the fact that once the caller's done, the string data referenced by that pointer will probably be freed. Store the referenced string in a std::string instead.
2011-02-05Add successful calls to array-style functions.Nat Goodspeed
2011-02-04fix linking to llqtwebkit.Alain Linden
2011-02-04Change FunctionsTriple refs to pointers to facilitate passing.Nat Goodspeed
A certain popular-but-dumb compiler seems to think that initializing a std::vector from a pair of iterators requires assignment. A struct containing a reference cannot be assigned. Pointers get us past this issue.
2011-02-04Move FunctionsTriple data to function returning vector<same>.Nat Goodspeed
We want to break out a couple different test methods that both need the same data. While we could define a std::vector<FunctionsTriple> in the lleventdispatcher_data class and initialize it using a classic {} initializer as in array_funcs(), using a separate function puts it closer to the tests consuming that data, and helps reduce clutter in the central data class. Either way, it's cool that BOOST_FOREACH() handles the gory details of iterating over a std::vector vs. a classic-C array.
2011-02-03BOOST_FOREACH(LLSD) helpers more readable with 'using namespace'.Nat Goodspeed
2011-02-03Introduce BOOST_FOREACH() helpers for LLSD in llsdutil.h.Nat Goodspeed
You can't directly write: BOOST_FOREACH(LLSD item, someLLSDarray) { ... } because LLSD has two distinct iteration mechanisms, one for arrays and one for maps, neither using the standard [const_]iterator typedefs or begin()/end() methods. But with these helpers, you can write: BOOST_FOREACH(LLSD item, llsd::inArray(someLLSDarray)) { ... } or BOOST_FOREACH(const llsd::MapEntry& pair, llsd::inMap(someLLSDmap)) { ... } These are in namespace llsd instead of being (e.g.) llsd_inMap because with a namespace at least your .cpp file can have a local 'using': using namespace llsd; BOOST_FOREACH(LLSD item, inArray(someLLSDarray)) { ... } It's namespace llsd rather than LLSD because LLSD can't be both a namespace and a class name.
2011-02-03Add test to call array-style functions with too-short array.Nat Goodspeed
Also, finally got sick of hand-writing the official iterator-loop idiom and dragged in BOOST_FOREACH(). Because LLSD has two completely different iteration styles, added inArray and inMap helper classes to be able to write: BOOST_FOREACH(LLSD item, inArray(someArray)) { ... }
2011-02-02Add test to call no-args functions using (map | array)-style callsNat Goodspeed
2011-02-02Add test to exercise map/array args mismatch validation.Nat Goodspeed
2011-02-02First few LLEventDispatcher call cases: try_call(), call CallablesNat Goodspeed
2011-02-01Replace boost::ptr_map<name, etc> with std::map<name, shared_ptr>.Nat Goodspeed
On Windows, unlike on Mac or Linux, boost::ptr_map<> started insisting on this concept of clonability. In other words, it wants to own a unique instance of the pointee; if you copy a value_type -- even to dereference an iterator! -- it wants to construct a whole new instance of the mapped_type. That's nuts. A std::map<..., boost::shared_ptr<>> has the property I want (the mapped_type goes away when the entry is erased), plus it's willing to pass around the shared_ptr to the same instance of the mapped_type. This change also permits simplifying a couple awkward kludges I'd already had to make to accommodate ptr_map's idiosyncracies.
2011-02-01Replace ad-hoc test functions/methods with systematic enumeration.Nat Goodspeed
Previous tests involved a small handful of functions with only a couple different parameter types. Now we exhaustively invoke every registration case, plus every metadata query case. Call cases still pending.
2011-02-01Automated merge up from viewer-development into mesh-developmentLoren Shih
2011-01-31Fix crash bug in array-style metadata query for nullary functions.Nat Goodspeed
The shortcut way to construct an LLSD array of size n is to assign LLSD() to array[n-1]. That's fine -- as long as you remember not to do it for n == 0.