| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
Previous logic was vulnerable to the case in which both pipes reached EOF in
the same loop iteration. Now we use std::list instead of std::vector, allowing
us to iterate and delete with a single pass.
|
|
Otherwise the unreferenced declaration causes a fatal warning.
|
|
Quiet the temporary child_status_callback() output.
Add a bit of diagnostic info if apr_proc_wait() returns anything but
APR_CHILD_DONE.
|
|
At least on OS X 10.7, a call to apr_proc_wait(APR_NOWAIT) in fact seems to
block the caller. So instead of polling apr_proc_wait(), use APR callback
mechanism (apr_proc_other_child_register() et al.) and poll that using
apr_proc_other_child_refresh_all().
Evidently this polls the underlying system waitpid(), but the internal call
seems to better support nonblocking. On arrival in the
child_status_callback(APR_OC_REASON_DEATH) call, though, apr_proc_wait()
produces ECHILD: the child process in question has already been reaped.
The OS-encoded wait() status does get passed to the callback, but then we have
to use OS-dependent macros to tease apart voluntary termination vs. killed by
signal... a bit of a hole in APR's abstraction layer.
Wrap ensure_equals() calls with a macro to explain which comparison failed.
|
|
Fix EOL issues: "\r\n" vs. "\n".
On Windows, requesting a read in nonblocking mode can produce EAGAIN instead
of EWOULDBLOCK.
|
|
That is, where before we just flung stuff to stdout with the expectation that
a human user would verify, replace with assertions in the test code itself.
Quiet previous noise on stdout.
Introduce a temp script file that produces output on both stdout and stderr,
with sleep() calls so we predictably have to wait for it. Track and then
verify the history of our interaction with the child process, noting
especially EWOULDBLOCK attempts.
|
|
|
|
As always with llcommon, this is expressed as an "integration test" to
sidestep a circular dependency: the llcommon build depends on its unit tests,
but all our unit tests depend on llcommon.
Initial test code is more for human verification than automated verification:
does APR's child-process management in fact support nonblocking operations?
|