summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h')
-rw-r--r--indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h68
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h b/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h
index 92fba4c1a8..1b915dfd6e 100644
--- a/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h
+++ b/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h
@@ -223,7 +223,13 @@ LLSingletonBase::LLSingletonBase(tag<DERIVED_TYPE>):
* Derive your class from LLSingleton, passing your subclass name as
* LLSingleton's template parameter, like so:
*
- * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo>{};
+ * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo>
+ * {
+ * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass
+ * LLSINGLETON(Foo);
+ * public:
+ * // ...
+ * };
*
* Foo& instance = Foo::instance();
*
@@ -279,6 +285,16 @@ private:
return new DERIVED_TYPE();
}
+ // We know of no way to instruct the compiler that every subclass
+ // constructor MUST be private. However, we can make the LLSINGLETON()
+ // macro both declare a private constructor and provide the required
+ // friend declaration. How can we ensure that every subclass uses
+ // LLSINGLETON()? By making that macro provide a definition for this pure
+ // virtual method. If you get "can't instantiate class due to missing pure
+ // virtual method" for this method, then add LLSINGLETON(yourclass) in the
+ // subclass body.
+ virtual void you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() = 0;
+
// stores pointer to singleton instance
struct SingletonLifetimeManager
{
@@ -450,4 +466,54 @@ private:
template<typename T>
typename LLSingleton<T>::SingletonData LLSingleton<T>::sData;
+/**
+ * Use LLSINGLETON(Foo); at the start of an LLSingleton<Foo> subclass body
+ * when you want to declare an out-of-line constructor:
+ *
+ * @code
+ * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo>
+ * {
+ * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass
+ * LLSINGLETON(Foo);
+ * public:
+ * // ...
+ * };
+ * // ...
+ * [inline]
+ * Foo::Foo() { ... }
+ * @endcode
+ *
+ * Unfortunately, this mechanism does not permit you to define even a simple
+ * (but nontrivial) constructor within the class body. If it's literally
+ * trivial, use LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(); if not, use LLSINGLETON() and define
+ * the constructor outside the class body. If you must define it in a header
+ * file, use 'inline' (unless it's a template class) to avoid duplicate-symbol
+ * errors at link time.
+ */
+#define LLSINGLETON(DERIVED_CLASS) \
+private: \
+ /* implement LLSingleton pure virtual method whose sole purpose */ \
+ /* is to remind people to use this macro */ \
+ virtual void you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() {} \
+ friend class LLSingleton<DERIVED_CLASS>; \
+ DERIVED_CLASS()
+
+/**
+ * Use LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(Foo); at the start of an LLSingleton<Foo>
+ * subclass body when the constructor is trivial:
+ *
+ * @code
+ * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo>
+ * {
+ * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass
+ * LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(Foo);
+ * public:
+ * // ...
+ * };
+ * @endcode
+ */
+#define LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(DERIVED_CLASS) \
+ /* LLSINGLETON() is carefully implemented to permit exactly this */ \
+ LLSINGLETON(DERIVED_CLASS) {}
+
#endif