diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h')
-rw-r--r-- | indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h | 68 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h b/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h index 92fba4c1a8..1b915dfd6e 100644 --- a/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h +++ b/indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h @@ -223,7 +223,13 @@ LLSingletonBase::LLSingletonBase(tag<DERIVED_TYPE>): * Derive your class from LLSingleton, passing your subclass name as * LLSingleton's template parameter, like so: * - * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo>{}; + * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo> + * { + * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass + * LLSINGLETON(Foo); + * public: + * // ... + * }; * * Foo& instance = Foo::instance(); * @@ -279,6 +285,16 @@ private: return new DERIVED_TYPE(); } + // We know of no way to instruct the compiler that every subclass + // constructor MUST be private. However, we can make the LLSINGLETON() + // macro both declare a private constructor and provide the required + // friend declaration. How can we ensure that every subclass uses + // LLSINGLETON()? By making that macro provide a definition for this pure + // virtual method. If you get "can't instantiate class due to missing pure + // virtual method" for this method, then add LLSINGLETON(yourclass) in the + // subclass body. + virtual void you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() = 0; + // stores pointer to singleton instance struct SingletonLifetimeManager { @@ -450,4 +466,54 @@ private: template<typename T> typename LLSingleton<T>::SingletonData LLSingleton<T>::sData; +/** + * Use LLSINGLETON(Foo); at the start of an LLSingleton<Foo> subclass body + * when you want to declare an out-of-line constructor: + * + * @code + * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo> + * { + * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass + * LLSINGLETON(Foo); + * public: + * // ... + * }; + * // ... + * [inline] + * Foo::Foo() { ... } + * @endcode + * + * Unfortunately, this mechanism does not permit you to define even a simple + * (but nontrivial) constructor within the class body. If it's literally + * trivial, use LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(); if not, use LLSINGLETON() and define + * the constructor outside the class body. If you must define it in a header + * file, use 'inline' (unless it's a template class) to avoid duplicate-symbol + * errors at link time. + */ +#define LLSINGLETON(DERIVED_CLASS) \ +private: \ + /* implement LLSingleton pure virtual method whose sole purpose */ \ + /* is to remind people to use this macro */ \ + virtual void you_must_use_LLSINGLETON_macro() {} \ + friend class LLSingleton<DERIVED_CLASS>; \ + DERIVED_CLASS() + +/** + * Use LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(Foo); at the start of an LLSingleton<Foo> + * subclass body when the constructor is trivial: + * + * @code + * class Foo: public LLSingleton<Foo> + * { + * // use this macro at start of every LLSingleton subclass + * LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(Foo); + * public: + * // ... + * }; + * @endcode + */ +#define LLSINGLETON_EMPTY_CTOR(DERIVED_CLASS) \ + /* LLSINGLETON() is carefully implemented to permit exactly this */ \ + LLSINGLETON(DERIVED_CLASS) {} + #endif |